Tuesday, 22 November 2011

"Spray and Pray"

I read an interesting article regarding the opinion of some tech guys out of the US. Well, some pretty substantial tech guys actually- Sean Parker, from the early Facebook days, and his partner Jim Breyer. The gist of the article is how early stage VC funding is really based around funding anything and everything tech related- “spray and pray” investing. What is really interesting is how this type of funding mentality bleeds the top talent, spreading it out thinly across many start-ups.
What I take away from this interview is that imitating what an industry is doing is not always the right thing to do, and may in fact create a false sense of economic “upswing.” It also creates a generation of people that potentially believe that if they have a good idea, they should get money to make the idea real without understanding what it takes to create, develop, and productize, or provide the desired value. I am seeing a movement away from business fundamentals.
Take for instance the realization of an idea.
How is the idea translated into something that can be sold? Is there a market? What does the market look like? For every dollar that I put into the idea, what can I expect in return? Is it sustainable? Can it evolve? What does the product lifecycle look like? What do I need operationally to support the idea? The list goes on.
If we lose sight of these business fundamentals, how does this affect the economy? We saw this in the early days of the internet, where anyone could create a website and have a presence. The ones that survived understood what it took to create a product, market the product, and provide sustainable interest in their goods and services.
This isn’t meant to be a criticism, just a warning. When talent is spread thin and money is thick, is there really an incentive to build a sustainable business? Don’t mistake my sentiment- building, growing, and managing through all this isn’t easy. However, building a strong company that provides real value is where my stake is staying.

Tuesday, 15 November 2011

“Future Vision"

I spend a lot of time reading about technology; what the big guys are doing, the little guys, and pretty much anything I can get my RSS feeds to grab for me. But when I saw MS Future Vision I was immediately confused. I like the idea of AR being able to tell me where an appointment is, or a board in my kitchen that is tied to my monthly calendar; I even like the idea of “intelligent surfaces”. What confuses me is that the family that was represented here didn’t REALLY seem to be interacting. At least, not the way I want my life to be.

Let me break it down. It’s great that the parent is travelling, seemingly on a business trip. She arrives at night, and is seen in the hotel room during the day “interacting” with her daughter remotely. Here’s where I get confused: This video depicts interaction as being remote. I actually travel a fair chunk and I do video call with my kids- but it isn’t something that I enjoy doing. I keep my travelling to a minimum, as I don’t like being away.

Additionally, what bothered me was the idea that the other parent, who is home, is interacting less with the daughter than the remote parent. Again, there is an overtone that “remote” connection is just as good as being there.

Some may argue that since the parent has to travel, any interaction is a consolation to not being able to interact at all. Sure, this seems valid, however technology should not define the interaction, it should purely exist to augment it. Idealistic, maybe, but instead I believe that we should be with our children, with our families. Yes, I know, the video doesn’t negate being with our families since we really are “there” virtually, but what it does for me is provide a new definition of family interaction- one that confuses me.

Maybe this is a traditionalist view, maybe an overreaction, but what it made me realize is that a TV, iPad, iPhone, kids games, etc. are only technologies that can enhance my children’s development and not define that development, and this goes for me as well.

Just one man’s opinion about a quickly changing world.

"Going outside is highly overrated."
Ernest Cline, Ready Player One